Specialized instruments help to perform the chopping
BY JÉRÔME C. VRYGHEM, MD
Most cataract surgeons obtain excellent means of ultrasound and, thanks to its holding proper-
ties, helps to dislodge the nuclear fragments. Higher
flow and vacuum levels and the mechanical action of
sion. In these cases, a conventional fold-
the chopper compensate for the lower ultrasound set-
able IOL is easily implanted and the procedure is safe
tings. In a bimanual procedure, the instruments can
and effective. Patients are in the habit of demanding a
easily be switched, making access to all parts of the
safe, high-quality, and effective procedure. The way I
deliver these results is to offer microincision cataract
When the incision size is reduced, the sleeve of the
phaco tip must be removed. Modern phaco technolo-
An experienced cataract surgeon loves to push his
limits because it provides excitement in the routine ofdaily surgery. Once a surgeon manages to try MICS,conquer the learning curve, and improve upon his sur-gical parameters, he develops a system that is difficultto abandon for his old, broader incision technique.
In an attempt to decrease ultrasound distribution in
the anterior chamber and shorten my procedure times,I first moved from the divide and conquer to stop andchop technique. I then transitioned to phaco chop.
Using the Sovereign phaco system (Advanced MedicalOptics, Inc., Santa Ana, California; Figure 1), I was ableto reduce my effective phaco time to an average of 1.43seconds.
Once I started phaco chop, my procedure immedi-
ately became bimanual. The chopper helps me to crackthe nucleus as well as manipulate or stabilize the frag-ments. The phaco probe fragments the nucleus by
Figure 1. Dr. Vryghem at the operating microscope.
I CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY EUROPE I 57
GmbH, Nuemberg, Germany; Figure 2) provides a flowof 80 mL/minute and makes sure that the bottle heightof the balanced salt solution does not need to beincreased.
The actual size of my sideport incision is 1.2 mm for
the 20-gauge slightly bent phaco tip. The main incisionis 1.4 mm during phacoemulsification; it is enlarged to1.9 mm for IOL insertion.
Appropriate instruments are needed when using
smaller incisions for MICS. The MST DuetCapsulorrhexis (MicroSurgical Technology, Redmond,Washington; Figure 3) forceps provide perfect control
Figure 2. The Vryghem Chopper
Figure 3. The Duet
of the rhexis even when performed through a small
has an ultrathin wall, a bigger
incision. IOLs for MICS must have a suitable design for
lumen, and a Nagahara tip.
provide control of the
stability in the capsular bag and a normal-sized optic (6
rhexis through a
mm). To avoid damaging the IOL during MICS, I prefer
injection using a Medicel 1.8 mm cartridge (MedicelAG, Wolfhalden, Switzerland). The cartridge is docked
gy, such as that of the WhiteStar software (AdvancedMedical Optics, Inc.) developed for the Sovereignphaco machine, makes sure that thermal burns at the
site of the incision are avoided. Only a perfect match
between the size of the sideport and the phaco tip inone hand and the main incision and the irrigating
phaco chopper in the other hand can ensure anterior
chamber stability. In the beginning, this can be a chal-lenge to achieve, as fluctuations in the anterior cham-ber cause the patient discomfort.
into the incision; the tip does not penetrate into the
Therefore, under a Healon5 (Advanced Medical
anterior chamber. I prefer hydrophilic acrylic IOLs, such
Optics, Inc.) dome, I inject intracameral lidocaine
as the Acri.Tec Acri.Smart 36A (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG,
before creating the capsulorrhexis (ie, Arshinoff tech-
Jena, Germany) or the PhysIOL MicroSlim (Liége,
nique) and while performing hydrodissection and
Belgium). Both lenses give excellent visual results and
To ensure a good anterior chamber depth and a high
I believe that the differences in induced astigmatism
flow rate, I developed a titanium irrigating chopper
between a broader, 2.5-mm incision and a MICS inci-
with an ultrathin wall (50 µm), a bigger lumen, and a
sion are nonsignificant. Since first performing my small
Nagahara tip. The Vryghem Chopper (A.R.C Laser
incision bimanual phaco technique, I have been ableto analyze and fine-tune my phaco parameters so
much that I feel more in control of these parametersnow than when I used a broader incision. For me, since
• Incisions of 1.2 and 1.4 mm can be used for nucleus
transitioning to MICS as my routine procedure, there
removal with a MICS chopping technique; the main incision
is no way to return to a broader incision again.
is widened to 1.9 mm for IOL insertion.
I am completely comfortable performing MICS in allcases. ■
• Dr. Vryghem’s effective phaco time with MICS is 1.43 sec-
Jérôme C. Vryghem, MD, practices at
• Intracameral lidocane is injected under a Healon5 dome
Brussels Eye Doctors, in Brussels, Belgium. Dr.
Vryghem states that he has no financial inter-est in the products or companies mentioned.
• The differences in induced astigmatism between a 2.5-
He is a member of the
CRST Europe Editorial
mm and a microincision are nonsignificant.
Board. Dr. Vryghem may be reached at +32 2 741 6999;firstname.lastname@example.org.
I CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY EUROPE I APRIL 2008
Das Messer in der Hand Besuchen Sie uns im Internet: www.knaur.de Ein Unternehmen der Droemerschen Verlagsanstalt Th. Knaur Nachf. GmbH & Co. KG, MünchenAlle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk darf – auch teilweise – nur mit Genehmigung des Verlags wiedergegeben werden. Umschlaggestaltung: ZERO Werbeagentur, MünchenUmschlagabbildung: mauritius images/Busse YankushevDruck und
MONTGOMERY-HOUSE NEW TRAVEL SERVICE TRAVEL CLINIC – PRICE LIST Nurse Consultation Hepatitis A Hepatitis A for children Typhoid (Adults and Children) Typhoid & Hep A Junior Vaccine Hepatitis B for travel Normal regime involves 3 vaccinations £37 per vaccine or a rapid schedule for travel includes a 4th booster Prepayment course of 3 for £111.